# Goals of the PR
The PR introduces **no changes to functionality**, apart from improved
input validation here and there. The main goals are to reduce some
complexity of the code, to improve types and IDE completions, and to
extend documentation and block comments where appropriate. Because of
the change to the trainer interfaces, many files are affected (more
details below), but still the overall changes are "small" in a certain
sense.
## Major Change 1 - BatchProtocol
**TL;DR:** One can now annotate which fields the batch is expected to
have on input params and which fields a returned batch has. Should be
useful for reading the code. getting meaningful IDE support, and
catching bugs with mypy. This annotation strategy will continue to work
if Batch is replaced by TensorDict or by something else.
**In more detail:** Batch itself has no fields and using it for
annotations is of limited informational power. Batches with fields are
not separate classes but instead instances of Batch directly, so there
is no type that could be used for annotation. Fortunately, python
`Protocol` is here for the rescue. With these changes we can now do
things like
```python
class ActionBatchProtocol(BatchProtocol):
logits: Sequence[Union[tuple, torch.Tensor]]
dist: torch.distributions.Distribution
act: torch.Tensor
state: Optional[torch.Tensor]
class RolloutBatchProtocol(BatchProtocol):
obs: torch.Tensor
obs_next: torch.Tensor
info: Dict[str, Any]
rew: torch.Tensor
terminated: torch.Tensor
truncated: torch.Tensor
class PGPolicy(BasePolicy):
...
def forward(
self,
batch: RolloutBatchProtocol,
state: Optional[Union[dict, Batch, np.ndarray]] = None,
**kwargs: Any,
) -> ActionBatchProtocol:
```
The IDE and mypy are now very helpful in finding errors and in
auto-completion, whereas before the tools couldn't assist in that at
all.
## Major Change 2 - remove duplication in trainer package
**TL;DR:** There was a lot of duplication between `BaseTrainer` and its
subclasses. Even worse, it was almost-duplication. There was also
interface fragmentation through things like `onpolicy_trainer`. Now this
duplication is gone and all downstream code was adjusted.
**In more detail:** Since this change affects a lot of code, I would
like to explain why I thought it to be necessary.
1. The subclasses of `BaseTrainer` just duplicated docstrings and
constructors. What's worse, they changed the order of args there, even
turning some kwargs of BaseTrainer into args. They also had the arg
`learning_type` which was passed as kwarg to the base class and was
unused there. This made things difficult to maintain, and in fact some
errors were already present in the duplicated docstrings.
2. The "functions" a la `onpolicy_trainer`, which just called the
`OnpolicyTrainer.run`, not only introduced interface fragmentation but
also completely obfuscated the docstring and interfaces. They themselves
had no dosctring and the interface was just `*args, **kwargs`, which
makes it impossible to understand what they do and which things can be
passed without reading their implementation, then reading the docstring
of the associated class, etc. Needless to say, mypy and IDEs provide no
support with such functions. Nevertheless, they were used everywhere in
the code-base. I didn't find the sacrifices in clarity and complexity
justified just for the sake of not having to write `.run()` after
instantiating a trainer.
3. The trainers are all very similar to each other. As for my
application I needed a new trainer, I wanted to understand their
structure. The similarity, however, was hard to discover since they were
all in separate modules and there was so much duplication. I kept
staring at the constructors for a while until I figured out that
essentially no changes to the superclass were introduced. Now they are
all in the same module and the similarities/differences between them are
much easier to grasp (in my opinion)
4. Because of (1), I had to manually change and check a lot of code,
which was very tedious and boring. This kind of work won't be necessary
in the future, since now IDEs can be used for changing signatures,
renaming args and kwargs, changing class names and so on.
I have some more reasons, but maybe the above ones are convincing
enough.
## Minor changes: improved input validation and types
I added input validation for things like `state` and `action_scaling`
(which only makes sense for continuous envs). After adding this, some
tests failed to pass this validation. There I added
`action_scaling=isinstance(env.action_space, Box)`, after which tests
were green. I don't know why the tests were green before, since action
scaling doesn't make sense for discrete actions. I guess some aspect was
not tested and didn't crash.
I also added Literal in some places, in particular for
`action_bound_method`. Now it is no longer allowed to pass an empty
string, instead one should pass `None`. Also here there is input
validation with clear error messages.
@Trinkle23897 The functional tests are green. I didn't want to fix the
formatting, since it will change in the next PR that will solve #914
anyway. I also found a whole bunch of code in `docs/_static`, which I
just deleted (shouldn't it be copied from the sources during docs build
instead of committed?). I also haven't adjusted the documentation yet,
which atm still mentions the trainers of the type
`onpolicy_trainer(...)` instead of `OnpolicyTrainer(...).run()`
## Breaking Changes
The adjustments to the trainer package introduce breaking changes as
duplicated interfaces are deleted. However, it should be very easy for
users to adjust to them
---------
Co-authored-by: Michael Panchenko <m.panchenko@appliedai.de>
## implementation
I implemented HER solely as a replay buffer. It is done by temporarily
directly re-writing transitions storage (`self._meta`) during the
`sample_indices()` call. The original transitions are cached and will be
restored at the beginning of the next sampling or when other methods is
called. This will make sure that. for example, n-step return calculation
can be done without altering the policy.
There is also a problem with the original indices sampling. The sampled
indices are not guaranteed to be from different episodes. So I decided
to perform re-writing based on the episode. This guarantees that the
sampled transitions from the same episode will have the same re-written
goal. This also make the re-writing ratio calculation slightly differ
from the paper, but it won't be too different if there are many episodes
in the buffer.
In the current commit, HER replay buffer only support 'future' strategy
and online sampling. This is the best of HER in term of performance and
memory efficiency.
I also add a few more convenient replay buffers
(`HERVectorReplayBuffer`, `HERReplayBufferManager`), test env
(`MyGoalEnv`), gym wrapper (`TruncatedAsTerminated`), unit tests, and a
simple example (examples/offline/fetch_her_ddpg.py).
## verification
I have added unit tests for almost everything I have implemented.
HER replay buffer was also tested using DDPG on [`FetchReach-v3`
env](https://github.com/Farama-Foundation/Gymnasium-Robotics). I used
default DDPG parameters from mujoco example and didn't tune anything
further to get this good result! (train script:
examples/offline/fetch_her_ddpg.py).
The new proposed feature is to have trainers as generators.
The usage pattern is:
```python
trainer = OnPolicyTrainer(...)
for epoch, epoch_stat, info in trainer:
print(f"Epoch: {epoch}")
print(epoch_stat)
print(info)
do_something_with_policy()
query_something_about_policy()
make_a_plot_with(epoch_stat)
display(info)
```
- epoch int: the epoch number
- epoch_stat dict: a large collection of metrics of the current epoch, including stat
- info dict: the usual dict out of the non-generator version of the trainer
You can even iterate on several different trainers at the same time:
```python
trainer1 = OnPolicyTrainer(...)
trainer2 = OnPolicyTrainer(...)
for result1, result2, ... in zip(trainer1, trainer2, ...):
compare_results(result1, result2, ...)
```
Co-authored-by: Jiayi Weng <trinkle23897@gmail.com>
This PR implements BCQPolicy, which could be used to train an offline agent in the environment of continuous action space. An experimental result 'halfcheetah-expert-v1' is provided, which is a d4rl environment (for Offline Reinforcement Learning).
Example usage is in the examples/offline/offline_bcq.py.
This is the third PR of 6 commits mentioned in #274, which features refactor of Collector to fix#245. You can check #274 for more detail.
Things changed in this PR:
1. refactor collector to be more cleaner, split AsyncCollector to support asyncvenv;
2. change buffer.add api to add(batch, bffer_ids); add several types of buffer (VectorReplayBuffer, PrioritizedVectorReplayBuffer, etc.)
3. add policy.exploration_noise(act, batch) -> act
4. small change in BasePolicy.compute_*_returns
5. move reward_metric from collector to trainer
6. fix np.asanyarray issue (different version's numpy will result in different output)
7. flake8 maxlength=88
8. polish docs and fix test
Co-authored-by: n+e <trinkle23897@gmail.com>
- Refacor code to remove duplicate code
- Enable async simulation for all vector envs
- Remove `collector.close` and rename `VectorEnv` to `DummyVectorEnv`
The abstraction of vector env changed.
Prior to this pr, each vector env is almost independent.
After this pr, each env is wrapped into a worker, and vector envs differ with their worker type. In fact, users can just use `BaseVectorEnv` with different workers, I keep `SubprocVectorEnv`, `ShmemVectorEnv` for backward compatibility.
Co-authored-by: n+e <463003665@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: magicly <magicly007@gmail.com>
* remove dummy net; delete two files
* split code to have backbone and head
* rename class
* change torch.float to torch.float32
* use flatten(1) instead of view(batch, -1)
* remove dummy net in docs
* bugfix for rnn
* fix cuda error
* minor fix of docs
* do not change the example code in dqn tutorial, since it is for demonstration
Co-authored-by: Trinkle23897 <463003665@qq.com>
