246 lines
		
	
	
		
			7.9 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			TeX
		
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
			
		
	
	
			246 lines
		
	
	
		
			7.9 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			TeX
		
	
	
	
	
	
|  | 
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | \subsection{Skin friction drag} | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | Skin friction is one of the most notable sources of model rocket | |||
|  | drag.  It is caused by the friction of the viscous flow of air | |||
|  | around the rocket.  In his thesis Barrowman presented formulae for | |||
|  | estimating the skin friction coefficient for both laminar and | |||
|  | turbulent boundary layers as well as the transition between the | |||
|  | two~\cite[pp.~43--47]{barrowman-thesis}.  As discussed above, a fully | |||
|  | turbulent boundary layer will be assumed in this thesis. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | %Two calculation methods will
 | |||
|  | %be presented, one for ``typical'' rockets and one for those with very
 | |||
|  | %fine precision finish.
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | The skin friction coefficient $C_f$ is defined as the drag coefficient | |||
|  | due to friction with the reference area being the total wetted area | |||
|  | of the rocket, that is, the body and fin area in contact with the | |||
|  | airflow: | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | \begin{equation} | |||
|  | C_f = \frac{D_{\rm friction}}{\frac{1}{2} \rho v_0^2\;A_{\rm wet}} | |||
|  | \end{equation} | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | The coefficient is a function of the rocket's Reynolds number $R$ and | |||
|  | the surface roughness. | |||
|  | %, defined
 | |||
|  | %as
 | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | %\begin{equation}
 | |||
|  | %R = \frac{v_0\;L_r}{\nu}
 | |||
|  | %\end{equation}
 | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | %where $v_0$ is the free-stream velocity of the rocket, $L_r$ is the
 | |||
|  | %length of the rocket and $\nu$ is the local kinematic viscosity of
 | |||
|  | %air.  
 | |||
|  | The aim is to first calculate the skin friction coefficient, | |||
|  | then apply corrections due to compressibility and geometry effects, | |||
|  | and finally to convert the coefficient to the proper reference area. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | \subsubsection{Skin friction coefficients} | |||
|  | \label{sec-skin-friction-coefficient} | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | The values for $C_f$ are given by different formulae depending on the | |||
|  | Reynolds number.  If $R<5\cdot10^5$ the flow is assumed to be | |||
|  | completely laminar, and the corresponding skin friction coefficient is | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | \begin{equation} | |||
|  | C_f = \frac{1.328}{\sqrt{R}}. | |||
|  | \label{eq-laminar-friction} | |||
|  | \end{equation} | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | Correspondingly, for completely turbulent flow (also for low Reynolds | |||
|  | numbers when forced by some protrusion from the surface) the | |||
|  | coefficient is given by | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | \begin{equation} | |||
|  | C_f = \frac{1}{(1.50\; \ln R - 5.6)^2}. | |||
|  | \label{eq-turbulent-friction} | |||
|  | \end{equation} | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | Above $R=5\cdot10^5$ some of the flow around the rocket is turbulent | |||
|  | and some laminar.  Measured data of the transition results in an | |||
|  | empirical formula for the transition from | |||
|  | equation~(\ref{eq-laminar-friction}) to | |||
|  | equation~(\ref{eq-turbulent-friction}) as | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | \begin{equation} | |||
|  | C_f = \frac{1}{(1.50\;\ln R - 5.6)^2} - \frac{1700}{R}. | |||
|  | \label{eq-transition-friction} | |||
|  | \end{equation} | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | This equation gives a continuation from the laminar equation.  The | |||
|  | exact point of switch to the transitional equation is the point where | |||
|  | equations (\ref{eq-laminar-friction}) and | |||
|  | (\ref{eq-transition-friction}) are equal, $R=5.39\cdot10^5$. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | % Exact transition point from laminar to transitional
 | |||
|  | %    R = 539154
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | The above formulae assume that the surface is ``smooth'' and the | |||
|  | surface roughness is completely submerged in a laminar sublayer.  At | |||
|  | sufficient speeds even slight roughness may have an effect on the skin | |||
|  | friction.  The critical Reynolds number corresponding to the roughness | |||
|  | is given by | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | \begin{equation} | |||
|  | R_{\rm crit} = 51\left(\frac{R_s}{L_r}\right)^{-1.039}, | |||
|  | \end{equation} | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | where $R_s$ is an approximate roughess height of the surface.  A few | |||
|  | typical roughness heights are presented in Table~\ref{tab-roughnesses}. | |||
|  | For Reynolds numbers above the critical value, the skin friction | |||
|  | coefficient can be considered independent of Reynolds number, and has | |||
|  | a value of | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | \begin{equation} | |||
|  | C_f = 0.032\left(\frac{R_s}{L_r}\right)^{0.2}. | |||
|  | \label{eq-critical-friction} | |||
|  | \end{equation} | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | % TODO: ep<65>jatkuvuus karkeudessa
 | |||
|  | % mit<69> jos karkeus suurta?
 | |||
|  | % Katso Hoernerista!!
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | \begin{table} | |||
|  | \caption{Approximate roughness heights of different | |||
|  |   surfaces~\cite[p.~XXX]{hoerner}} | |||
|  | \label{tab-roughnesses} | |||
|  | \begin{center} | |||
|  | \begin{tabular}{lc} | |||
|  | Type of surface & Height / \um \\ | |||
|  | \hline | |||
|  | Average glass                  & 0.1 \\ | |||
|  | Finished and polished surface  & 0.5 \\ | |||
|  | Optimum paint-sprayed surface  & 5 \\ | |||
|  | Planed wooden boards           & 15 \\ | |||
|  | % planed = h<>yl<79>tty ???
 | |||
|  | Paint in aircraft mass production & 20 \\ | |||
|  | Smooth cement surface          & 50 \\ | |||
|  | Dip-galvanized metal surface   & 150 \\ | |||
|  | Incorrectly sprayed aircraft paint & 200 \\ | |||
|  | Raw wooden boards              & 500 \\ | |||
|  | Average concrete surface       & 1000 \\ | |||
|  | \hline | |||
|  | \end{tabular} | |||
|  | \end{center} | |||
|  | \end{table} | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | Finally, a correction must be made for very low Reynolds numbers.  The | |||
|  | experimental formulae are applicable above approximately | |||
|  | $R\approx10^4$.  This corresponds to velocities typically below 1~m/s, | |||
|  | and have therefore negligible effect on simulations.  Below this | |||
|  | Reynolds number, the skin friction coeffifient is assumed to be equal | |||
|  | as for $R=10^4$. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | As a summary, when assuming the rocket to be finished with enough | |||
|  | precision to have a significant portion of laminar flow, the value of | |||
|  | $C_f$ is computed by | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | \begin{equation} | |||
|  | C_f = \left\{ | |||
|  | \begin{array}{ll} | |||
|  | 1.33\cdot10^{-2}, & \mbox{if $R<10^4$} \\ | |||
|  | \mbox{Eq.~(\ref{eq-laminar-friction})}, & \mbox{if $10^4<R<5.39\cdot10^5$} \\ | |||
|  | \mbox{Eq.~(\ref{eq-transition-friction})}, & \mbox{if  | |||
|  |       $5.39\cdot10^5 < R < R_{\rm crit}$} \\ | |||
|  | \mbox{Eq.~(\ref{eq-critical-friction})}, & \mbox{if $R>R_{\rm crit}$} | |||
|  | \end{array} | |||
|  | \right. . | |||
|  | \end{equation} | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | When assuming a fully turbulent flow, $C_f$ is computed by | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | \begin{equation} | |||
|  | C_f = \left\{ | |||
|  | \begin{array}{ll} | |||
|  | 1.48\cdot10^{-2}, & \mbox{if $R<10^4$} \\ | |||
|  | \mbox{Eq.~(\ref{eq-turbulent-friction})}, & \mbox{if $10^4<R<R_{\rm crit}$} \\ | |||
|  | \mbox{Eq.~(\ref{eq-critical-friction})}, & \mbox{if $R>R_{\rm crit}$} | |||
|  | \end{array} | |||
|  | \right. . | |||
|  | \end{equation} | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | These formulae are plotted in Figure~\ref{fig-skinfriction-plot}. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | \begin{figure} | |||
|  | \centering | |||
|  | \epsfig{file=figures/drag/skinfriction.eps,width=11cm} | |||
|  | \caption{Skin friction coefficient of fully laminar | |||
|  |   (Eq.~(\ref{eq-laminar-friction})), fully turbulent | |||
|  |   (Eq.~(\ref{eq-turbulent-friction})), transitional | |||
|  |   (Eq.~(\ref{eq-transition-friction})) and roughness-limited | |||
|  |   (Eq.~(\ref{eq-critical-friction})) boundary layers.} | |||
|  | \label{fig-skinfriction-plot} | |||
|  | % TODO: kuva matlabilla, kapeampi pystysuunnassa
 | |||
|  | \end{figure} | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | \subsubsection{Compressibility corrections} | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | The laminar skin friction coefficient is constant at both subsonic and | |||
|  | low supersonic speeds, ${C_f}_c = C_f$.  However, at subsonic speeds | |||
|  | the smooth turbulent value of equation~(\ref{eq-turbulent-friction}) | |||
|  | and the roughness-limited value of | |||
|  | equation~(\ref{eq-critical-friction}) must be corrected with | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | \begin{equation} | |||
|  | {C_f}_c = C_f\; (1-0.1\, M^2). | |||
|  | \end{equation} | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | In supersonic flow, the smooth turbulent skin friction coefficient | |||
|  | must be corrected with | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | \begin{equation} | |||
|  | {C_f}_c = \frac{C_f}{(1+0.15\, M^2)^{0.58}} | |||
|  | \end{equation} | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | and the roughness-limited value with | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | \begin{equation} | |||
|  | {C_f}_c = \frac{C_f}{1 + 0.18\, M^2}. | |||
|  | \end{equation} | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | However, the corrected roughness-limited value should not be used if | |||
|  | it would yield a value smaller than the corresponding smooth turbulent | |||
|  | value.  In order not to cause discontinuities, the transition point | |||
|  | from of laminar to turbulent corrections and from subsonic to | |||
|  | supersonic is done gradually over a suitable Reynolds number or Mach | |||
|  | number range. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | \subsubsection{Skin friction drag coefficient} | |||
|  | \label{sec-skin-friction-drag} | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | After correcting the skin friction coefficient for compressibility | |||
|  | effects, the coefficient can be converted into the actual drag | |||
|  | coefficient.  This is performed by scaling it to the correct reference | |||
|  | area.  The body wetted area is corrected for its cylindrical geometry, | |||
|  | and the effect of finite fin thickness which Barrowman handled | |||
|  | separately is also included~\cite[p.~55]{barrowman-thesis}.  The total | |||
|  | friction drag coefficient is then | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | \begin{equation} | |||
|  | (C_D)_{\rm friction} = {C_f}_c \; \frac{ | |||
|  |   \del{1 + \frac{1}{2f_B}} \cdot A_{\rm wet,body} +  | |||
|  |   \del{1 + \frac{2t}{\bar c}} \cdot A_{\rm wet,fins}} | |||
|  |    {\Aref} | |||
|  | \label{eq-friction-drag-scale} | |||
|  | \end{equation} | |||
|  | %
 | |||
|  | where $f_B$ is the fineness ratio of the rocket, and $t$ the thickness | |||
|  | and $\bar c$ the mean aerodynamic chord length of the fins.  The | |||
|  | wetted area of the fins $A_{\rm wet,fins}$ includes both sides of the | |||
|  | fins. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | 
 |