Addition for aerodynamic properties of falling stages
This commit is contained in:
parent
4141b478f7
commit
4ea003cbc4
@ -2233,3 +2233,60 @@ attack, this approximation provides a sufficiently accurate estimate
|
||||
for the purposes of this thesis.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Lower stage aerodynamics}
|
||||
|
||||
In staged rockets the lower stages of the rocket separate from the
|
||||
main rocket body and descend to the ground on their own. While large
|
||||
rockets have parachutes also in lower stages, most model rockets rely
|
||||
on the stages falling to the ground without any recovery device. As
|
||||
the lower stages typically are not aerodynamically stable, they tumble
|
||||
during descent, significantly reducing their speed.
|
||||
|
||||
This kind of tumbling is difficult if not impossible to model in
|
||||
6-DOF, and the orientation is typically not of interest anyway.
|
||||
Therefore for simulating the descent of aerodynamically unstable
|
||||
stages, it is sufficient to compute the average aerodynamic drag of
|
||||
the tumbling lower stage.
|
||||
|
||||
While model rockets are built in very peculiar forms, staged rockets
|
||||
are typically much more conservative in their design. The lower
|
||||
stages are most often formed of just a body tube and fins. Five such
|
||||
models were constructed for testing their descent aerodynamic drag.
|
||||
The physical properties of the models are listed in Table~XX.
|
||||
|
||||
% # fins
|
||||
% root chord
|
||||
% tip chord
|
||||
% fin height
|
||||
% diameter
|
||||
% mass
|
||||
\begin{table}
|
||||
\caption{Physical properties of the lower stage models}
|
||||
\begin{tabular}{cccccc}
|
||||
Model: & #1 & #2 & #3 & #4 & #5 \\
|
||||
fins & 3 & 3 & 4 & 0 & 3 \\
|
||||
$C_r$ & & & & - & \\
|
||||
$C_t$ & & & & - & \\
|
||||
$s$ & & & & - & \\
|
||||
$d$ & & & & & \\
|
||||
$m$ & & & & & \\
|
||||
\end{tabular}
|
||||
\end{table}
|
||||
|
||||
The drop tests were performed from a height of XX meters and the drop
|
||||
was recorded on Full HD video. From the video frames the position of
|
||||
the component was calculated XX times per second. The resulting graph
|
||||
is presented in Figure~XX. The terminal velocity was determined for
|
||||
all models.
|
||||
|
||||
At terminal velocity the drag force is equal to that of gravity:
|
||||
%
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
C_{D*} \cdot \frac{1}{2}\rho v_0^2 A_* = mg
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
%
|
||||
From this it is easy to determine the drag coefficient $C_{D*}$ for a
|
||||
particular reference area $A_*$.
|
||||
|
||||
For a tumbling rocket, it is reasonable to assume that the drag force
|
||||
is relative to the profile area of the rocket.
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user