Addition for aerodynamic properties of falling stages
This commit is contained in:
parent
4141b478f7
commit
4ea003cbc4
@ -2233,3 +2233,60 @@ attack, this approximation provides a sufficiently accurate estimate
|
|||||||
for the purposes of this thesis.
|
for the purposes of this thesis.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\section{Lower stage aerodynamics}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In staged rockets the lower stages of the rocket separate from the
|
||||||
|
main rocket body and descend to the ground on their own. While large
|
||||||
|
rockets have parachutes also in lower stages, most model rockets rely
|
||||||
|
on the stages falling to the ground without any recovery device. As
|
||||||
|
the lower stages typically are not aerodynamically stable, they tumble
|
||||||
|
during descent, significantly reducing their speed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This kind of tumbling is difficult if not impossible to model in
|
||||||
|
6-DOF, and the orientation is typically not of interest anyway.
|
||||||
|
Therefore for simulating the descent of aerodynamically unstable
|
||||||
|
stages, it is sufficient to compute the average aerodynamic drag of
|
||||||
|
the tumbling lower stage.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
While model rockets are built in very peculiar forms, staged rockets
|
||||||
|
are typically much more conservative in their design. The lower
|
||||||
|
stages are most often formed of just a body tube and fins. Five such
|
||||||
|
models were constructed for testing their descent aerodynamic drag.
|
||||||
|
The physical properties of the models are listed in Table~XX.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% # fins
|
||||||
|
% root chord
|
||||||
|
% tip chord
|
||||||
|
% fin height
|
||||||
|
% diameter
|
||||||
|
% mass
|
||||||
|
\begin{table}
|
||||||
|
\caption{Physical properties of the lower stage models}
|
||||||
|
\begin{tabular}{cccccc}
|
||||||
|
Model: & #1 & #2 & #3 & #4 & #5 \\
|
||||||
|
fins & 3 & 3 & 4 & 0 & 3 \\
|
||||||
|
$C_r$ & & & & - & \\
|
||||||
|
$C_t$ & & & & - & \\
|
||||||
|
$s$ & & & & - & \\
|
||||||
|
$d$ & & & & & \\
|
||||||
|
$m$ & & & & & \\
|
||||||
|
\end{tabular}
|
||||||
|
\end{table}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The drop tests were performed from a height of XX meters and the drop
|
||||||
|
was recorded on Full HD video. From the video frames the position of
|
||||||
|
the component was calculated XX times per second. The resulting graph
|
||||||
|
is presented in Figure~XX. The terminal velocity was determined for
|
||||||
|
all models.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
At terminal velocity the drag force is equal to that of gravity:
|
||||||
|
%
|
||||||
|
\begin{equation}
|
||||||
|
C_{D*} \cdot \frac{1}{2}\rho v_0^2 A_* = mg
|
||||||
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
%
|
||||||
|
From this it is easy to determine the drag coefficient $C_{D*}$ for a
|
||||||
|
particular reference area $A_*$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For a tumbling rocket, it is reasonable to assume that the drag force
|
||||||
|
is relative to the profile area of the rocket.
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user