2023-04-18 21:48:26 -05:00

309 lines
18 KiB
Plaintext

Body Tube Data Tables
=====================
Copyright 2016-2018 by Dave Cook NAR 21953 caveduck17@gmail.org
See the file LICENSE in this distribution for license information.
Estes-Compatible Series
-----------------------
All of these listed by Semroc that match Estes designations have identical sizes.
Ones that don't have known Estes counterparts are marked with * in the comments.
SEMROC never listed a BT-56 - it was essentially identical to Centuri #13 though.
SERIES ID OD RingID RingOD
OD+.002 ID-.002
------ ----- ----- ------ ------
BT-1+ 0.220 0.246 0.248 0.218 * Quest MMX motor mount tube
BT-2 0.255 0.281 0.283 0.253 * slips over MMX motor mount T-1+
BT-2+ 0.297 0.310 0.312 0.295 * slips over BT-2
BT-3 0.349 0.375 0.377 0.347
BT-4 0.422 0.448 0.450 0.420 *
BT-4+ 0.452 0.478 0.480 0.450 * slips over BT-4
BT-5 0.515 0.543 0.545 0.513
BT-5+ 0.559 0.585 0.587 0.557 * slips over BT-5
BT-19 0.674 0.700 0.702 0.672 * what is this? Semroc BNC-19MC is a merc capsule
BT-20 0.710 0.736 0.738 0.708
BT-20+ 0.744 0.770 0.772 0.742 * slips over BT-20
BT-30 0.725 0.767 0.769 0.723
BT-40 0.765 0.825 0.827 0.763
BT-50 0.950 0.976 0.978 0.948
BTH-50 0.950 0.992 0.994 0.948 * foil lined 24mm MMT
BT-50+ 0.984 1.010 1.012 0.982 * but only .001 different from BT-51
BT-51 0.985 1.011 1.013 0.983
BT-52 0.988 1.014 1.016 0.986
BTH-52 1.140 1.220 1.222 1.138 * exactly same as LT-115
BT-55 1.283 1.325 1.327 1.281
BT-56est 1.304 1.346 1.348 1.302 not carried by Semroc; equivalent to Centuri ST-13
BT-56sem 1.346 1.367 1.369 1.344 * believed to be erroneously derived from Estes sizing
BT-58 1.498 1.540 1.542 1.496
BT-60 1.595 1.637 1.639 1.593
BT-70 2.175 2.217 2.219 2.173
BTH-70 2.175 2.247 2.249 2.173 *
BT-80 2.558 2.600 2.602 2.556
BTH-80 2.558 2.640 2.642 2.556 * eRocket tube size chart disagrees with old SEMROC chart
BT-99 3.668 3.700 3.702 3.666 aka RT-99, only avail in very short ring
BT-100 3.702 3.744 3.746 3.700
BT-101 3.896 3.938 3.940 3.894
Centuri-Compatible Series
-------------------------
SERIES ID OD RingID RingOD
OD+.002 ID-.002
------ ----- ----- ------ ------
#2 0.234 0.260 0.262 0.232
#5 0.515 0.543 0.545 0.513 Identical to Estes BT-5
#6 0.610 0.650 0.652 0.608
#7 0.715 0.759 0.761 0.713
#8 0.865 0.908 0.910 0.863
#8F 0.885 0.921 0.923 0.883 Semroc only: Same OD as FSI HRT-8 but thicker .018 wall
#9 0.950 0.998 1.000 0.948 24mm MMT, same ID as BT-50 but .024 wall
#10 1.000 1.040 1.042 0.998
#11 1.130 1.170 1.172 1.128
#13 1.300 1.340 1.342 1.298
#16 1.600 1.640 1.642 1.598
#18 1.800 1.840 1.842 1.798
#20 2.000 2.040 2.042 1.998
#27 2.674 2.700 2.702 2.672
#36 3.600 3.690 3.692 3.598
Large Tube Series (compatible with old Centuri heavy wall tubes)
----------------------------------------------------------------
These are now listed on the eRocket/SEMROC site as LT-xxx
These are not the same as the newer Estes PSII 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0 tubes which are .034 wall
SERIES ID OD RingID RingOD
OD+.002 ID-.002
------ ----- ----- ------ ------
#085 0.865 0.945 0.947 0.863
#115 1.140 1.220 1.222 1.138
#125 1.250 1.340 1.342 1.248
#150 1.500 1.590 1.592 1.498
#175 1.750 1.840 1.842 1.748
#200 2.000 2.080 2.082 1.198 why is wall 0.040 when others above #115 are 0.045 ?
#225 2.250 2.340 2.342 2.248
#275 2.750 2.840 2.842 2.748
Clear Tube Series - CPT are Centuri sizes, PST are Estes sizes
--------------------------------------------------------------
CPT #7 0.715 0.759 0.761 0.713
CPT #8 0.865 0.908 0.910 0.863
CPT #10 1.039 1.060 1.062 1.037 note .020 larger vs ST-10 paper tube
SOURCE ERROR: conclusively wrong data on SEMROC legacy page (repeats CPT-8 dimensions)
SOURCE ERROR: inconsistent data on new 2017 eRockets/Semroc page: ID 1.039, OD 1.060, wall .021
CPT #13 1.300 1.340 1.342 1.298 eRockets/Semroc gives slightly incorrect wall .022
PST-50 0.950 0.976 0.978 0.948
PST-55 1.283 1.325 1.327 1.281
PST-65 1.750 1.774 1.776 1.748
Metric tubes (MRI/MPC/Quest) - dimensions in mm
-----------------------------------------------
T5 4.00 5.00 5.10 3.90 MPC only
T7 6.50 7.00 7.10 6.40 Micromaxx motor tube
T10 9.40 10.00 10.10 9.30 Quest calls this Micromaxx Tube 2
T14 13.00 14.00 14.10 12.90 MPC only, MMT for 13mm motors
T15 14.00 15.00 15.10 13.90 Standard 15mm body tube, Quest specs as ID 0.550", OD 0.590"
T19 18.08 18.75 18.85 17.98 Quest 18mm motor mount tube, gives ID 0.712", OD 0.738"
T20 19.10 20.00 20.10 19.00 Standard 20mm body tube
T21 20.20 21.20 21.30 20.10 Quest 21 mm motor mount tube for their former 20mm D motors, gives ID 0.795", OD 0.835"
T24 23.25 23.90 24.00 23.15 24mm motor mount tube
T25 24.00 25.00 25.10 23.90 Standard 25mm body tube
T29 MMT 29.00 30.90 31.00 28.90 Quest 29mm MMT, same ID but heavier wall than 30mm standard tube
T30 29.00 30.00 30.10 28.90 Standard 30mm body tube
T31 28.96 30.86 30.96 28.86 Quest calls this "29mm motor mount tube", gives ID 1.14", OD 1.215"
T35 34.00 35.00 35.10 33.90 Standard 35mm body tube, Quest specs ID 1.340", OD 1.380" == 34.0/35.0 mm
T40 39.00 40.00 40.10 38.90 Standard 40mm body tube (also for FAI events)
T50 48.80 50.00 50.10 48.70 Standard 50mm body tube, Quest specs ID 1.92", OD 1.97"
Aerotech tubes
--------------
See http://www.rocketryforum.com/showthread.php?70990-aerotech-tube-dimensions
AER-1.9 1.800 1.880 1.882 1.798 dimensions from Rocketarium. AT gave 1.87 OD
AER-2.6 2.56 2.64 2.642 2.558 dimensions from Aerotech posted in TRF 16 Nov 2014
AER-4.0 3.90 3.987 from TRF post 16 Nov 2014, AT quotes .005 tolerance
Blue Tube
---------
New size values from alwaysreadyrocketry.com in the store on the 'size' dropdown items
Masses are computed from my derived-from-measurements avg density of 1153.5 kg/m3 +/- 17.3
Many mass values from Apogee are inaccurate unless there is wild variation, but my densisty stddev
definitely does not support the notion of highly variable mass.
It has been reported that blue tube sizes have not been consistent across the years and batches though.
SERIES ID OD MaxLen Mass RingID RingOD
48 in OD+.003 ID-.003
------ ----- ----- ------ ------ -------- -------
Blu-29mm 1.150 1.274 48.0 214.2 g
Blu-38mm 1.520 1.644 48.0 279.6 g measured mass: 284 g
Blu-54mm 2.150 2.274 48.0 392.4 g measured masses: 389.0, 388.0 (2 samples)
Blu-2.6 2.560 2.684 48.0 463.4 g measured mass: 454, 468 g (2 samples)
Blu-75mm 3.000 3.124 48.0 542.6 g measured mass: 553 g
Blu-98mm 3.900 4.024 48.0 700.2 g mass reported by Coker: 696 g
Blu-5.5 5.500 5.654 48/72 1224 g
Blu-6.0 6.000 6.148 48/72 1281 g
Blu-7.5 7.500 7.660 48/72 1728 g
Estes PSII Tubes - .034 wall (my measurement)
---------------------------------------------
SERIES ID OD RingID RingOD
OD+.05 ID-.05
------ ----- ----- ------ ------
29mm MMT 1.140 1.208 1.213 1.135
2.0 1.932 2.000 2.005 1.927
2.5 2.432 2.500 2.505 2.427
3.0 2.932 3.000 3.005 2.927
4.0 3.900 4.000 4.005 3.895 same as LOC tube, Mega Der Red Max
FSI tube data from 1977 and 1993 catalogs
-----------------------------------------
SERIES ID OD Len Wt RingID RingOD Lengths
------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ --------------------------
RT-6 0.715*** 0.755 18.0 0.425 0.757 0.713 18" PN 6006 (1993)
RT-8+ 0.881** 0.921 18.0 0.425 0.923 0.879 18" PN 6008 (1993)
HRT-8+ 0.881** 0.921 16.0 0.425 0.923 0.879 HRT-816, HRT-808, HRT-804
HRT-10+ 1.13 1.17 18.0 0.725 1.172 1.128 HRT-1018, HRT-1009, HRT-1004
RT-12 1.30 1.34 18.0 0.738 1.342 1.298 RT-1218, RT-1209, RT-1204
RT-15 1.60 1.64 18.0 0.936 1.642 1.598 RT-1518, RT-1512, RT-1506
RT-17 1.80 1.84 18.0 0.950 1.842 1.798 18" PN 6017 (1993)
RT-19 2.00 2.04 18.0 1.184 2.042 1.998 RT-1918, RT-1912, RT-1906
RT-22 2.25 2.34 22.0 3.0 2.342 2.248 22" PN 6022 (1993)
+ HRT-8 and HRT-10 designations changed to RT-8 and RT-10 by the 1993 catalog.
*** ID, wall and mass of RT-6 have messed up data...the 1993 catalog had an obvious typo of .175" for the ID.
Likewise the 0.425 oz weight quoted for the RT-6 is an obvious duplication of the much older value
for the HRT-8.
For the RT-6 we can solve the case by knowing that a) this is MMT for 18mm motors and the ID is going to be
in the .710 to .715 range; b) FSI leaned toward Centuri dimensions as RT-15/17/19/22 are
exact duplicates of Centuri sizes; c) the typo value of .175 is an anagram of a likely correct
value of 0.715"; and d) all of the other wall thicknesses down through RT-19 are .020".
Here I conclude with high confidence that the ID is 0.715".
** I am flagging the catalog value .903" ID of HRT-8 / RT-8 as a certain error. The HRT-8 was
described in the FSI 1977 catalog as "Heavy Duty tubes for engine mounts", yet with the given ID it would
have only a .009" wall, which is not reasonable. FSI also specified the motor diameter as 21 mm, which
would be 0.827", a LOT smaller than the quoted tube diameter. I do personally recall that the FSI 21mm
motors were a pretty loose fit in the motor tubes, but a .08" difference is huge.
The 0.903 ID remained all the way to the 1993 catalog where the "H" prefix had been
dropped and the length changed from 16" to 18". The quoted weight did not change here, confirming
they were not careful about recalculating data when parts were modified.
It must be mentioned that the .903" dimension also appears on nose cone HNC-81, transition HTS-810,
and coupler BB-8 size data, but the egregious typo of .175" for the RT-6 also propagated to its mating parts,
so I don't think the multiple occurrences of that value add to the evidence.
A volumetric calculation (using OpenRocket) with known Kraft paper density gives about half the quoted
weight of .425 oz for a 16" RT-8 with ID = 0.903". If, however, we assume a wall of .020" like most of
the other tubes, the weight comes to 0.47 oz, which seems very reasonable.
For what it's worth, the Semroc version of this tube (Semroc PN ST-8Fxx) has an ID of 0.885", implying a
wall of 0.018", and Carl McLawhorn was rarely far off. The CMR 21mm motor tube (RB-90) had ID 0.864" and
OD 0.890" with .013 wall, and I recall it was a better fit for the motors.
Thus I am adopting an ID of 0.881" for the RT-8 and HRT-8.
LOC tube data from 2018 website
-------------------------------
Note: weights are quoted on the site in lbs in the "additional information" tab and look to be mostly inaccurate.
The diameters and weights given for motor tubes and couplers in the same tab are totally inaccurate.
The tables below contain only the LOC-provided specs from the website. See the body_tube_data.xlsx
spreadsheet for improved data from actual measurements.
Airframes
---------
SERIES ID OD Len Wt RingID RingOD Lengths Notes
------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ------------- -------------
BT-1.0/LBT-50 0.95 1.00 12.0 0.1 lb 1.003 0.947 12 Same as 24mm MMT
BT-1.52 1.52 1.625 34.0 0.25 lb 1.628 1.517 34 Same as 38mm MMT
BT-2.14 2.14 2.26 34.0 0.24 lb 2.263 2.137 34 Same as 54mm MMT
BT-2.56 2.56 2.63 30.0 0.4 lb 2.633 2.557 30 Heavy wall BT-80 ID compatible
BT-3.00 3.00 3.10 34.0 0.5 lb 3.103 2.997 34 NOT same as 75mm MMT
BT-3.90 3.90 4.00 34.0 0.5 lb 4.003 3.897 34 NOT same as 98mm MMT
BT-5.38 5.38 5.54 42.0 1.2 lb 5.543 5.377 42
BT-7.51 7.51 7.675 30.0 3.43 lb* 7.678 7.507 30 Sold as 2x30" with a coupler
* weight of 7.51 airframe tube is quoted for 2x30" pieces of tube with a coupler of unspecified length.
Phenolic Tubes
--------------
These tubes appeared on the website in fall 2018. Only the FT-1.52 and FT-5.38 have listed lengths.
Dimensions are stated to be the same as the regular cardboard tubes. No mass data is given.
SERIES ID OD Len Wt RingID RingOD Lengths Notes
------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ------------- -------------
FT-1.52 1.52 1.625 34.0 1.628 1.517 34 Same as 38mm MMT
FT-2.14 2.14 2.26 2.263 2.137 Same as 54mm MMT
FT-2.56 2.56 2.63 2.633 2.557 Heavy wall BT-80 ID compatible
FT-3.00 3.00 3.10 3.103 2.997 NOT same as 75mm MMT
FT-3.90 3.90 4.00 4.003 3.897 NOT same as 98mm MMT
FT-5.38 5.38 5.54 42.0 5.543 5.377 42
FT-7.51 7.51 7.675 7.678 7.507
Motor Mount Tubes
-----------------
SERIES ID OD Len Wt RingID RingOD Lengths Notes
------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ------------- -------------
MMT-0.95 12.0 0.06875 lb (12") 6, 12 See LBT-50
MMT-1.14 12.0 0.125 lb (12") 8, 12
MMT-1.58 20.0 0.68 lb (20"), .375 lb (14") 11, 14, 20 See series 1.52 airframe
MMT-2.14 17.0 0.275 lb (17") 10, 14, 17 See series 2.14 airframe tube
MMTHD-300 34.0 0.875 lb 34
MMTHD-390 34.0 1.1875 lb 34
Couplers
--------
Actual dimensions not given except for length. Weights given are considered inaccurate.
SERIES ID OD Len Wt RingID RingOD Lengths Notes
------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ------------- -------------
CT-1.0 2.0 0.1 lb
TC-1.14 2.0 0.1 lb
TC-1.52 4.0 0.1 lb
TC-2.14* 2.022 2.126 6.0 27.2 gm Wall .052, 2017 sample
TC-2.56 6.0 0.12 lb
TC-3.00 8.0 0.19 lb
TC-3.90L 8.0 0.2 lb
TC-5.38 11.0 1 lb
TC-7.51 15.0 1 lb
* Dimensions and weight measured by D. Cook from actual example
Coupler Stiffeners
------------------
Note wildly inconsistent use of decimal point in SKUs here. These SKUs are held over from long ago but still in
use as of late 2018. Actual dimensions not given.
SERIES ID OD Len Wt RingID RingOD Lengths Notes
------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ------------- -------------
STC-214 5.0 0.0987 lb
STC-256 6.0 0.15625 lb
STC-3.00 6.0 0.1875 lb
STC-390L 7.75 0.25 lb
STC-5.38 11.0 0.625 lb
STC-751 15.0 1.625 lb
CMR - Competition Model Rockets (from 1972 catalog)
---------------------------------------------------
SERIES ID OD Len Wt RingID RingOD Lengths Notes
------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ------------- ------------------------
RB-50 0.538 0.558 12.0 0.561 0.535 12 MMT for 13mm motors
RB-52 0.564 0.584 12.0 0.587 0.561 12 slip fit over RB-50
RB-74 0.710 0.736 12.0 0.739 0.707 12 MMT for 18mm motors
RB-77 0.740 0.766 12.0 0.769 0.737 12 slip fit over RB-74
RB-90 0.864 0.890 16.0 0.893 0.861 16 MMT for FSI 21mm motors
RB-92 0.894 0.920 16.0 0.923 0.891 16 slip fit over RB-90
RB-120 1.120 1.170 18.0 1.173 1.117 18 MMT for FSI 27mm motors